|
(2) Sentence
Structure
|
|
The error
detection tests also test our ability to distinguish correct and incorrect
sentence structure. In analyzing the structure of a sentence, ask four
things:
|
|
( i ) Are the
elements of the sentence parallel?
|
|
( ii ) Do the
verb tenses correctly reflect the action?
|
|
( iii ) Are any
split constructions correctly completed?
|
|
( iv ) Does the
sentence say what it means to say?
|
|
|
Parallelism
|
|
In a correctly
written sentence, similar elements must have a similar form. For example,
|
|
( a ) To abandon their home, leave behind
1)/ their families and travelling 2)/ across the ocean required great courage
on the part of 3)/ the immigrants who moved to America. 4)/ No error 5)
|
|
Explanation :
|
|
The answer to the
above question is (2). The three verb forms ‘ abandon ’, ‘ leave ’ and ‘
travel ’ should be parallel. The sentence is corrected by changing ‘
travelling’ to ‘travel ’.
|
|
( b ) The r evi ew pr aised t he wi t ,
char m , and interpreting 1)/ of the recitalist 2)/ but never once mentioned
3)/ her voice. 4)/ No error 5)
|
|
Explanation :
|
|
The answer to the
above example is (1). ‘ Wit ’ and ‘ charm ’ are nouns, therefore ‘
interpreting ’ too, should be a noun. The sentence is corrected by changing ‘
interpreting ’ to ‘ interpretation ’.
|
|
( c ) To acknowledge that one has 1)/
something to learn is taking 2)/ the first step on the road 3)/ to true
wisdom. 4)/ No error 5)
|
|
Explanation :
|
|
The answer to the
above example is (2). The sentence has a structure similar to a mathematical
equation: ‘ This ’ is the same as ‘ that ’. Both parts of the “ equation ”
must have the same form. The sentence is corrected by changing ‘ taking ’ to
‘ to take ’.
|
|
Incomplete Split
Construction
|
|
A split
construction is a sentence structure in which two otherwise separate ideas
are joined together by a later element. For example,
|
|
The mayor knew or
should have known about the corruption.
|
|
This is a
perfectly acceptable split construction in which the ideas ‘ knew ’ and ‘
should have known ’ are joined together by the single object ‘ corruption ’.
In some split constructions, one half or the other never gets completed. For
example,
|
|
( a ) The students are critical of 1)/
the dean because he is either unfamiliar 2)/ or doesn’t care about the urgent
need for 3)/ new student housing on campus. 4)/ No error 5)
|
|
Explanation :
|
|
The answer to the
above example is (2). The split construction ‘ is either unfamiliar or
doesn’t care ’ never gets completed. Leave out the idea following the ‘ or ’
and the sentence reads in ‘ unfamiliar the urgent need ’. It sounds
ridiculous. The sentence should read ‘ is either unfamiliar with or doesn’t
care about ’.
|
|
( b ) Baseball has and 1)/ probably
always will be 2)/ the sport that symbolizes for people 3)/ in other
countries the American way of life. 4)/ No error 5)
|
|
Explanation :
|
|
The answer to the
above example is (1). The first half of the split verb construction is never
completed. Leave out the second idea and the sentence reads Baseball has been
the sport..... The sentence should read Baseball has been and probably always
will be......
|
0 comments:
Post a Comment
[img]https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-aFPBR4LADew/V85_aRWKXkI/AAAAAAAAHAw/O_N9dmf5tMQu0kSfbC3NU2yCzkLVQV7eACLcB/s320/share.png[/img]